low end punch

jetskier79

jetskier79

I'm goin' for two
Location
San Diego, CA
waxhead said:
you seem to have made an art form of being wrong
Click to expand...

Such a true statement.

He does a very good job of using relative terminology, in a manner that's 95% correct given a context of about 5 words. He normally seems to have a pretty valid understanding of the individual components of a system, but then completely misses the big pictures.

WaterHawk.....do you believe in cold fusion?
 
S

sflsurfrider

jetskier79 said:
Such a true statement.

He does a very good job of using relative terminology, in a manner that's 95% correct given a context of about 5 words. He normally seems to have a pretty valid understanding of the individual components of a system, but then completely misses the big pictures.
Click to expand...

like a politician!:scared:
 
the WaTeRhAwK

the WaTeRhAwK

fryin' up a/m electrics..
Location
okc
jetskier79 said:
Such a true statement.

He does a very good job of using relative terminology, in a manner that's 95% correct given a context of about 5 words. He normally seems to have a pretty valid understanding of the individual components of a system, but then completely misses the big pictures.

WaterHawk.....do you believe in cold fusion?
Click to expand...


thats a very interesting assessment there 79, so what exactly is the big picture I'm missing? and do explain in detail, I will be more than happy to disect it for you.

I have not studied the context of cold fusion very much at all, so I really wouldn't be able to tell you at this point wether I believe it is possible or not, from what I gather off the top without delving completely into it I really kindof get the impression that it's physically possible, but man doesn't have the technological ability to pull it off.
 
Last edited:
the WaTeRhAwK

the WaTeRhAwK

fryin' up a/m electrics..
Location
okc
charlie, I'll let you know tomorrow if my theory is correct about the siphoning thing, I'm going to try and drain a container of water with the stinger fitting and a hose going from the water to the pipe fitting, with the container of water below the level of the pipe.
 
the WaTeRhAwK

the WaTeRhAwK

fryin' up a/m electrics..
Location
okc
extractor theory confirmed, charlie. and damn your video sucksass..lol :biggrin:

with a clear 3/8" hose, of about 4 1/2 ft, hooked to the stinger fitting and the other end of the hose going into a 2 litter soda bottle half full of water, the water is drawn out by the exhaust, however, I've found that the liquid must br primed into the fitting by a pump bulb for the siphoning to take effect. this is with the bottle of water below the level of the ski. after the water is primed to the stinger while the ski is running, it will then draw the water out on it's own.

and this pipe is a factory half-pipe where the stinger fitting is sitting straight up 90 degrees with the pipe, where a lot of the aftermarket companies have set them at a 45 degree angle that I'm sure this helps with the drawing effect, just like the fitting for the bilge in the pump.


so it is a combination of the two things processing water, you have the water feed from the pump with the 3/8 pisser going out of the ski, passing the residual water to the headpipe at a relieved pressure, and the stinger fitting pulling the low pressure feed off of the headpipe as the the head pipe keeps the siphoning effect primed at the stinger. also, since the head pipe is above the stinger fitting it also has gravitational aspects in it's favor for keeping the stinger fitting primed for siphoning, as well.
 
S

sflsurfrider

the WaTeRhAwK said:
extractor theory confirmed, charlie. and damn your video sucksass..lol :biggrin:

with a clear 3/8" hose, of about 4 1/2 ft, hooked to the stinger fitting and the other end of the hose going into a 2 litter soda bottle half full of water, the water is drawn out by the exhaust, however, I've found that the liquid must br primed into the fitting by a pump bulb for the siphoning to take effect. this is with the bottle of water below the level of the ski. after the water is primed to the stinger while the ski is running, it will then draw the water out on it's own.

and this pipe is a factory half-pipe where the stinger fitting is sitting straight up 90 degrees with the pipe, where a lot of the aftermarket companies have set them at a 45 degree angle that I'm sure this helps with the drawing effect, just like the fitting for the bilge in the pump.


so it is a combination of the two things processing water, you have the water feed from the pump with the 3/8 pisser going out of the ski, passing the residual water to the headpipe at a relieved pressure, and the stinger fitting pulling the low pressure feed off of the headpipe as the the head pipe keeps the siphoning effect primed at the stinger. also, since the head pipe is above the stinger fitting it also has gravitational aspects in it's favor for keeping the stinger fitting primed for siphoning, as well.
Click to expand...


sorry, but my video concludes that youre wrong unless you have a video to prove otherwise. until then, all you have is useles words on a screen.

i win. you lose.

good day, sir.:woot:
 
ANT

ANT

Just ride
Location
Sea Isle City, NJ
I think dan would like an answer not an argument.

Dan, do you have a freeride dry pipe, or just a type..whatever dry pipe? A freeride dry pipe will give you more punch than any other dry pipe. Regardless of what anybody else says, a ski with a freeride dry pipe can have as much hit if not more than a ski with a b-pipe. I've ridden a ski with both different pipes in it and the difference is minimal. A flow control valve on a dry pipe would probably make almost no noticable difference because I'm pretty sure the stingers on the FPP dry pipes have a carb jet in them so there is already barely any water going through that stinger. If you want more low-end from your ski with less dollar you can get your flywheel lightened, bore your nozzle or get a cone. After that you will have to thin your wallet a little more- modified prop, porting, higher compression head, bigger carbs, and after them it is big dollars.
 
Matt_E

Matt_E

steals hub caps from cars
Site Supporter
Location
at peace
the WaTeRhAwK said:
extractor theory confirmed, charlie. and damn your video sucksass..lol :biggrin:

with a clear 3/8" hose, of about 4 1/2 ft, hooked to the stinger fitting and the other end of the hose going into a 2 litter soda bottle half full of water, the water is drawn out by the exhaust, however, I've found that the liquid must br primed into the fitting by a pump bulb for the siphoning to take effect. this is with the bottle of water below the level of the ski. after the water is primed to the stinger while the ski is running, it will then draw the water out on it's own.

and this pipe is a factory half-pipe where the stinger fitting is sitting straight up 90 degrees with the pipe, where a lot of the aftermarket companies have set them at a 45 degree angle that I'm sure this helps with the drawing effect, just like the fitting for the bilge in the pump.


so it is a combination of the two things processing water, you have the water feed from the pump with the 3/8 pisser going out of the ski, passing the residual water to the headpipe at a relieved pressure, and the stinger fitting pulling the low pressure feed off of the headpipe as the the head pipe keeps the siphoning effect primed at the stinger. also, since the head pipe is above the stinger fitting it also has gravitational aspects in it's favor for keeping the stinger fitting primed for siphoning, as well.
Click to expand...




:confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:
:crying: :crying: :crying: :crying:


What is wrong with you?
 
the WaTeRhAwK

the WaTeRhAwK

fryin' up a/m electrics..
Location
okc
charlie, the problem with your experiment is that there is no water going into the fitting, thats why the balloon is filling with exhaust and expanding. it does the same thing in my clear vinyl tubing at the end until water hits the fitting. as it begins siphoning the water the exhaust stops going into the fitting and the hose because it's too busy pulling the water through to let the exhaust back into the tube, in other words the fitting becomes blocked to the exhaust by the siphoning of the water.
 
S

sflsurfrider

dude, you cant have two different pressures in one given space. its physically impossible. post a video, or admit defeat.

i said GOOD DAY!
 
romack991

romack991

homebrewed
Location
Warsaw, IN
sflsurfrider said:
dude, you cant have two different pressures in one given space. its physically impossible. post a video, or admit defeat.

i said GOOD DAY!
Click to expand...

you may want to define space, because if your talking an enclosed tank with a fluid in it, there is a differential in pressure due to the mass of the fluid. typically with gases its so small its considered 0 but with liquids it is accounted for. also if you have a flowing system of tubes with bends, restrictions, ect, you will have a pressure loss due to the headloss of the restrictions.

BUT, that was just to stir the pot:rolleyes: , Waterhawks still full of :bs2:.

Travis, I'd be happy to review your equations/calculations that you come up with if you think you can prove your therioes... until then, go pick up a fluids book. And please no convoluted, wacked out terms to show you can search and copy and paste info, this is simple fluid physics.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom