I'm no engine builder but wouldn't you just take the diameter of the cylinder wall subtract the diameter of the piston and that will give you ring gap... I could be way off.
That's not the extended version. Still a nice looking van for its age. The 351 is a solid motor but very dated. If its your everyday vehicle your gas mileage is going to suffer. I would look for a Chevy/gmc AWD work van or find a quigley with at least the 5.4 v8 or v10 if you can't find the diesel.
While on this subject, 1200 are already a heavy motor, are. A/M hulls beefed up in the motor mount area? Also what mounts are guys running with 1200cc motors? It seems like 1 flip/roll fail could do some damage. Granted, most riders using big motors have the skills to pull most tricks off. Was...
I agree, that's a lot of dough to shell out for a pump. If you are going to run a big $$ money motor though, why not make use of the power?
That 1100 would scream on the top end with the right prop in a 144 but that doesn't seem be the goal since he was looking for low end.
There are so...
That's almost like saying stock tires will give you more traction than drag slicks....
You don't need to jump from 144 to 155 but 144 has its limits. An 1100pv motor tuned properly would probably just spin props all day in a 144. That's just wasting power if flat water tricks are your goal.
Thanks again to all for making it out to this ride. Always a good time down at peach bottom!! Thanks again to the Brawler guys (Brian and Josh) even after their long day, they still came to show off and let us demo their skis. Looking forward to next year already!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.