- Location
- savannah/hilton head
what is the difference between a setback and a standard skat trak pump, both performance and visually? i have a 12 vein but not sure which one it is.
The setback has shorter veins than the regular. The length is taken off the front which allows the impeller to be further back . So it does have to do with the length of the veins.One reason the veins are shorter is that it reduces drag allowing for slightly higher speeds at a given rpm with no loss of bottom end. I found the setback to hookup better than the non and still run one in my SJ and SXR.set back means the whole stator section is moved back in the pump. It has nothing to do with the length of the vanes. It does require a longer drive shaft. Supposedly they hook up better than non-set back pumps. I have run both and cant "feel" much difference... take that for what its worth
And it is not a kawi impeller, rather a specific Mag-pump impeller made by skat-trak for your 140mm pump.
matter of fact i just looked at the skat site setback article and it confirms that the veins are not moved back but just shortened. Also mentions hookup improvment because of the additional stored water in the intake gullet.
The setback has shorter veins than the regular. The length is taken off the front which allows the impeller to be further back . So it does have to do with the length of the veins.One reason the veins are shorter is that it reduces drag allowing for slightly higher speeds at a given rpm with no loss of bottom end. I found the setback to hookup better than the non and still run one in my SJ and SXR.
matter of fact i just looked at the skat site setback article and it confirms that the veins are not moved back but just shortened. Also mentions hookup improvment because of the additional stored water in the intake gullet.
If you go on Skat's website they have a pretty good description of the two. My understanding that a set back has a "shorter" stator section. That is instead of the veins being 3 inches in length from tip to tip they are say 2 inches. Therefore you would have a 1 inch set back pump. The 1 inch is accomidated for by using a 1 inch longer drive shaft or a 1 inch longer nose prop.
Advantages? Set back pumps are more for closed course top end speed. But then again I have read where the EME boats have the pump physicall moved back in the hull further. I don't know if they do this to 1) get the nozzle hanging out the back of teh ski more. Or 2) to have a bigger volume of water available infront of the prop.
I would just be stoked you have a magnum! A Kawie 750/800 new stainless cast one is around 1500![]()
since the pump is a 140 and not 144 does it use a kawi impeller?
set back means the whole stator section is moved back in the pump. It has nothing to do with the length of the vanes. It does require a longer drive shaft. Supposedly they hook up better than non-set back pumps. I have run both and cant "feel" much difference... take that for what its worth
And it is not a kawi impeller, rather a specific Mag-pump impeller made by skat-trak for your 140mm pump.
The setback has shorter veins than the regular. The length is taken off the front which allows the impeller to be further back . So it does have to do with the length of the veins.One reason the veins are shorter is that it reduces drag allowing for slightly higher speeds at a given rpm with no loss of bottom end. I found the setback to hookup better than the non and still run one in my SJ and SXR.
If this is true then why all the work to mod driveshafts and veins? Wouldn't it just be easier to extend the front of the pump, slide the entire pump back, and modify the mounting points? What am I missing?