Front Exhaust... Why?

Ericfox

Do it twice?That's DooDoo
Only reason I have found to run front exhaust on the stock waterbox is maybe it is better for tailstands...

For you guys that are running them: what have you found to be a benefit of having one? Maybe I am missing something....

I do see a lot of guys running them in all the videos I watch though...

Was the mod worth the cost???

Thanks.
 

Rickster

Matakana Menace
To me the mod was worth the cost on my Freestyle boat...

On my Surf boat I did not wantt he noise or smoke in my face (for long no-wake zones) so I went with a side rear exhaust only, which should keep the exhaust out of the pump cavity when landing in the surf.

:Banane35:
 

Attachments

  • square nose build (7).JPG
    square nose build (7).JPG
    138.1 KB · Views: 120

thegoldenboy

RN Surgery... soon
Location
Toronto
Also for deleting rear exhaust tube to widen tray, or run footholds further forward.

If you ride lakes that are medium to small I would not get it. Too annoying for any of the locals. I ride the same lake every weekend, I couldn't do it.

If you ride in the ocean or great lakes, than run whatever you want.

I may look into using a blockoff, for great lakes riding, convert it to either front and rear for big water, or rear only for my lake.
 

D Slicker

Durham, dont forget it
Location
Pottstown, PA
To me the mod was worth the cost on my Freestyle boat...

On my Surf boat I did not wantt he noise or smoke in my face (for long no-wake zones) so I went with a side rear exhaust only, which should keep the exhaust out of the pump cavity when landing in the surf.

:Banane35:

Same here. I ride mostly in the surf and got sick of the exhaust in my face.
 

Attachments

  • DSC00249.JPG
    DSC00249.JPG
    163.2 KB · Views: 78

Ericfox

Do it twice?That's DooDoo
yeah... I ride my ski mostly at small-medium lakes and then lake erie a couple times...

would it be very loud even with stock exhaust put out the front and back together
 

WaveDemon

Not Dead - Notable Member
Location
Hell, Florida
using 2½" exhaust makes it a less offensive exhaust tone too.

actually, I think Deblaster runs a single 2½" front only exhaust and he's not much louder than a stock ski.
 
Y

yamaslut

Guest
using 2½" exhaust makes it a less offensive exhaust tone too.

actually, I think Deblaster runs a single 2½" front only exhaust and he's not much louder than a stock ski.

mine is single 2.5" and it's not loud. I ran a waterline into the end of the exhaust pipe to muffle it though.
 

LBE

Eddie Would Go.
Location
Charlotte, NC
Rixter and D Slicker: How is the rear side exhaust at idle, and/or at slower speeds? Seems like there would be a lot of water restriction at lower speeds. I really like the look of that, was it a noticable diff from rear exhaust? Would you do it again? seems like a bigger project.
 
Rixter and D Slicker: How is the rear side exhaust at idle, and/or at slower speeds? Seems like there would be a lot of water restriction at lower speeds. I really like the look of that, was it a noticable diff from rear exhaust? Would you do it again? seems like a bigger project.

water restricition? as in surface drag? or do you mean backpressure?

if you mean backpressure, itd be no different than a stock rear outlet.

if you mean surface drag, thats WCFs boats are all being put together and there is no noticeable handling difference.
 

Rickster

Matakana Menace
Rixter and D Slicker: How is the rear side exhaust at idle, and/or at slower speeds? Seems like there would be a lot of water restriction at lower speeds. I really like the look of that, was it a noticable diff from rear exhaust? Would you do it again? seems like a bigger project.

I'll let you know tomorrow when I ride it for the first time....:friday:
 
Top Bottom