Search results

Bwahahaha! Well said riverrat:biggthumpup:

lol...

I am going to run it. Now the question is do I raise the sleeve to the cylinder wall (making it that 3mm higher) or leave it be at 61x port height and just leave the step behind the cylinder.

now you're just getting silly.... :Banane01:

blah, blah, blah I like the :skull2:

I really like the race looking one that says, "yes, they still make them". The upside down one should say, "for the riders, by the riders". Sell them both, you can have a bunch of different designs for peope to choose from. I'd definitely buy the "they still make them" shirt.

my square was 120# with holds, turf, reinforcements, - everything else removed.

All 94+ superjets come stock with a 61X cylinder. The 94 & 95 had 61x cases. The 96+ has 62t cases. The cylinder we are discussing is from the early Raider which has a 62t cylinder casting which has higher port timing but they seem to have 61x sleeves in them.

I disagree on the costs. You think the world class MXer's are on 3K bikes? No way. Maybe the local kid on the track is riding a 3K bike but thats the same as the average guy riding a roundnose or squarenose. All motorsports cost big $$ to be in the big leagues. I agree with MasterBlaster...

The blue line I got from LP (Paul) is holding up good. Those fuel filters do get a little soft though. question, why do people coil up extra fuel line for the oneway valve?

Measurements using calipers, From top of cylinder to top of exhaust port, 39mm From top of cylinder to top of transfer port, 55.5~56mm (sleeve is angled so value isnt the greatest. If I had the bottom end together I would put the deg wheel on it but not there yet.

looks good! (the hood that is, hull looks like crap, lol :biggrin:)

well, if the performance is going to be noticeably worse from a 61x cylinder, I'd rather take the hit and build the engine up right the first time. But since its already bored and i have pistons, I'm hoping it wont be a big deal.

where'd you get the hose? i was going to make one but couldnt find hose for a reasonable price... btw, threadjack!

I believe it is a stock 701 cylinder from a raider.

I'm building a new engine. Currently I have a 62t cylinder with a fresh 81.5 bore with new pistons. I'm debating if I want to use this or to sell it and get a 61x cylinder or a 760. But then I'd have to get new pistons and more than likely have the replacement cylinder bored too. The...

i like violence.

no reinforement to the rear side walls? i figured you would have thrown on an extra layer or two since you cracked your old hull there. ps. i'm catching up :highhorse:

yeah, like an archive.

I believe geek used these. 48 RING, TRIM 1 $33.99 41 NOZZLE, DEFLECTOR 1 $29.66 From RIVA. Which when I look up the 95 raider, that correlates to these numbers 62T-51190-00-5B RING,TRIM $33.99 62T-51313-00-00 NOZZLE DEFLECTOR $29.66