Yeah, I had read that, but the reviewer typically has 40 tabs open? Gimme a break, that's not a typical user at all. I might have 4-5 if I'm really working on something, but typically maybe 2-3.
Submit to Google, your internet overlord
- Thread starter SuperJETT
- Start date
Yeah, I had read that, but the reviewer typically has 40 tabs open? Gimme a break, that's not a typical user at all. I might have 4-5 if I'm really working on something, but typically maybe 2-3.
opera is available for winmo in 6.1 (or at least for my HTC Touch), and it's also available as a stand alone DL.
demolition_x
Not After Fame & Fortune
- Location
- Holden Beach / Wilmington NC
might want to read about it a little bit before you get too used to it
http://gizmodo.com/5044871/google-c...create-using-chrome-from-blog-posts-to-emails
http://gizmodo.com/5044871/google-c...create-using-chrome-from-blog-posts-to-emails
yamaslut
kill it
- Location
- Daytona Beach, Florida
I read that.. It's just saying they can regenerate your copywrited materials w/o permission... just to keep themselves safe from being sued. At least that was the consensus on the page I read.
btw - I can't scroll up in this browser... anyone else have that issue??
btw - I can't scroll up in this browser... anyone else have that issue??
SJBrit
Extraordinary Alien
- Location
- Bradenton, FL
That's a very silly article - nothing in the EULA claims ownership for Google: only rights as Slutty pointed out. How are Google supposed to display, for example, blog entries if you don't give them the right to? That's just the knee-jerk reaction of some fool who doesn't understand copyright law.
yamaslut
kill it
- Location
- Daytona Beach, Florida
werd to the Red Coat....
- Location
- Largo, Fl
Google has responded with haste to the huge outcry about a section in Chrome's EULA that gives Google "a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license" to do all kinds of dirty stuff—in public no less—to content you post through Chrome. Rebecca Ward, Senior Product Counsel for Google Chrome, told Ars that it's actually an oopsie from basically copying and pasting the same EULA it uses in other products, and that they're updating it as fast as they can to remove the ridiculous terms.
She says that Google is
"working quickly to remove language from Section 11 of the current Google Chrome terms of service. This change will apply retroactively to all users who have downloaded Google Chrome."
I can scroll like a mofo...
She says that Google is
"working quickly to remove language from Section 11 of the current Google Chrome terms of service. This change will apply retroactively to all users who have downloaded Google Chrome."
I can scroll like a mofo...
yamaslut
kill it
- Location
- Daytona Beach, Florida
that was the other thing people were saying, but it seemed a bit strange for a company that big to make a blunder like that... thanks for the real deal...
thanks ya scrollin' mo-fo... he he
SJBrit
Extraordinary Alien
- Location
- Bradenton, FL
That's fine, but the original terms weren't exactly onerous. They were simply asking "is it yours? can we display/distribute it?" - what's wrong with that?
DAG
Yes, my balls tickled from that landing
- Location
- Charlotte, NC
EULA is allready changed
WFO Speedracer
A lifetime ban is like a lifetime warranty !
- Location
- Alabama
Thank God I was going to stay up all night to make sure they didn't steal my internet stuff,now I can sleep soundly again.
DAG
Yes, my balls tickled from that landing
- Location
- Charlotte, NC
lol, i fell the same way.
/wipes sweat from forhead
/wipes sweat from forhead
Last edited:
- Location
- Mobile, AL
Konqueror > Chrome....
Just my $.02
Just my $.02
