- Location
- Sarasota, FL
Got a question, I'm a bit confused... If this has been addressed previously I didn't find it in my searches, my apologies - I'm new to SJ's and standups. Have a 00' RN
I have replaced the shoe (stock grate holes stripped out) - replacement was a Worx shoe. Installation was easy, it fit like a glove - nice finish work on it, didn't have to modify anything.
Here's the question... The grate does not seem to line up very well to the shoe. The rear mounting surface extends out past the curve of the shoe. That made me think - do I have the wrong shoe? Shoe seems to fit the hull perfect.
Have 2 grates, Worx 201 (just got), and an older Jet Dynamics w a big scoop on it although less aggressive scoop angle than the 201. Jet Dynamics concave extended rideplate, I weigh about 165.
The rear mounting section of both grates extends forward past the curve of the shoe.
The JD grate hangs low in the rear, about 1/8 down past the ride plate due to the thickness of the grate mount.
The Worx 201 will sit flush if it has a few washers under the rear bolts, otherwise it sits recessed up from ride plate about 1/8.
My ski w/ the JD grate porpoises like mad... I thought it was the seemingly poor grate fitment that probably caused that. Haven't tried the Worx 201 yet.
My ski has tubbies and a hooker 9/15 w stubbie cone.
In the pics, is what it should look like? To me, the fit to the curve of the shoe is still far from what would look right. Pics say a thousand words so I've attached a few.
Is it as supposed to be a good fit - curve of grate to shoe curve? What am I missing here?
Thanks for any help or opinions!
Jeff
Sent from my LG-H700 using Tapatalk
Sent from my LG-H700 using Tapatalk
I have replaced the shoe (stock grate holes stripped out) - replacement was a Worx shoe. Installation was easy, it fit like a glove - nice finish work on it, didn't have to modify anything.
Here's the question... The grate does not seem to line up very well to the shoe. The rear mounting surface extends out past the curve of the shoe. That made me think - do I have the wrong shoe? Shoe seems to fit the hull perfect.
Have 2 grates, Worx 201 (just got), and an older Jet Dynamics w a big scoop on it although less aggressive scoop angle than the 201. Jet Dynamics concave extended rideplate, I weigh about 165.
The rear mounting section of both grates extends forward past the curve of the shoe.
The JD grate hangs low in the rear, about 1/8 down past the ride plate due to the thickness of the grate mount.
The Worx 201 will sit flush if it has a few washers under the rear bolts, otherwise it sits recessed up from ride plate about 1/8.
My ski w/ the JD grate porpoises like mad... I thought it was the seemingly poor grate fitment that probably caused that. Haven't tried the Worx 201 yet.
My ski has tubbies and a hooker 9/15 w stubbie cone.
In the pics, is what it should look like? To me, the fit to the curve of the shoe is still far from what would look right. Pics say a thousand words so I've attached a few.
Is it as supposed to be a good fit - curve of grate to shoe curve? What am I missing here?

Thanks for any help or opinions!
Jeff
Sent from my LG-H700 using Tapatalk
Sent from my LG-H700 using Tapatalk