I rode a 750sxi once. It was only for a few minutes but I didn't like it. It felt very heavy to me compared to the 650sx. I think I'd personally prefer a 650sx with a 750 mod than a 750sxi, tho the 650sx does porpouse a lot..
It's a good deal if it's clean and reliable. Frayed throttle cables and corroded battery cables add up quick in repair costs. It's often cheaper to spend more on a cleaner ski than less on a rougher one. Check it out, make sure it's been well maintained and the price is right. It's ok if it's rough around the edges, as long as the motor has good compression, been properly flushed, etc, just worth less since you will have repairs to make on the minor things. Don't waste your time on anything with a less than promising motor/electronics.
I agree with Austin. "Race ski" is not a perk. It's a disclaimer. When I look to buy a quad, it becomes worth less to me the moment I see a picture of someone jumping it or mudding it. Advertising isn't a time to show off. I want a quad that's detailed with a picture taken inside a garage. If someones ego is so big they have to make themselves feel big when they are selling their quad, how hard do you have to think that quad was ridden? "My wife owned it, she never used it, but I maintained it well, with few aggressive modifications" is worth WAY more than "Race ski".
A true race ski is always a quater turn adjustment of the carb to reach catastrophic failure. Race != reliable.