One thing I will investigate some day but have not gotten around to. The stator for the 800 appears to be designed for an 8 pole flywheel, where the 760 appears to be designed for a 4 pole flywheel. Using a zeel that will have zero affect on how the ignition works since it could have no magnets at all and run fine as a total loss, but it might affect charging system performance. I'm really not sure if it would or wouldn't (I'm not even 100 percent sure about the 4 vs 8 pole thing). Still, I would use an 800 flywheel in an 800 based electrical system since they are usually cheaper anyway and I would want to have the stronger charging system of the 800 working properly.
Yes I did. 56 static angle just like 62t. If you run total loss the flywheel doesn’t matter between 760/800. Storbeck is correct that the magnets are different so if you want to run charging, you have to run an 800 flywheel. It worked very well on my XS motor. In fact it’s still on the DVX - my friend has it and it’s currently for sale. Just get a stock 800 cover and cut the crap out of it.
I always lengthen the lobes on 760 zeel setups to reduce cranking timing. This isn’t really related to this thread but it’s helpful on long stroke motors where 18 degrees of cranking timing is too much.
Zeeltronic will work killer on it. im not 100% on the static angle but you can use an 800 or 760 flywheel on the zeeltronic on an 800.
Good question, they will only run with the zeeltronic and they will still charge. You can only swap if you are using a zeel as its a dc cdi and not using the flywheel to make the ignition cdi powerIs there a difference in the magnets of the 64x/66e flywheels ? Orientation ? Number of N/S poles ?
The flywheel, or, rotor assembly P/N for 64x is 64x-85550-00-00 and for 66e it is 66e-85550-00-00. Is the 64x/66e in the part number just a preface referencing that the 85550-00-00 rotor is used in each of these assemblies?