Gentlemen,I agree with all of the above :smile:.Sometimes I don't trust the center of the crank,espically the one I used on Billys flywheel.Although I agree on using a live or dead center so long as the tailstock is dead nuts aligned with the lathe head.Instead I took a new JE wrist pin and put it in the lathe an put an indicator on it.It ran out .0001(one tenth of one thousandth),so I know the lathe is accurate,espically for fixed chucks.The old snout I put in it ran out .0001(one tenth of one thousandth) also,so from that point I lightened the flywheel.The outer thickness varies.001(one thousandth),the face varies .001(one thousandth).In my opinion it will be fine,if it was mine,i'd run it in my engine! :icon16:We have a HINES balancer here,but the flywheel arbor is a bit too big! LOL. I still may try to machine an arbor if I have time.But ,I think it will be fine as is. As you can tell by the photo Billy took,I machined the face comming close to the hub but not touching it, using a 1/32 radius carbide bit.After the face was done I radiused the 2 openings in the front,smoothed and deburred all machined surfaces.I wanted to magnaflux the flywheel for cracks afterwords,but wasn't sure how the solution would react with the magnets,besides,the solution has very fine metal particles in it.Would of been a pain in the ass cleaning the magnets,it was bad enough removing the machining chips from them :crying: Well,i've rambled on long enough,hope nobody fell asleep reading this,time to get back to work!Ya'll have a nice day!:wave: