61x/61x to 62T question

[Roseand]

Just because some of you are ok with a 61x bottom end doesn't mean he should sell his. There is no argument that its a better crankcase that makes more power.

Ride what ya got, until your ready swap the 61x cylinder on the 62t cases. Its not an opinion that its a better option and makes more power, its a fact.

Id wait till you can afford a pipe and some port work and do it all at once.

I personally hate a 9/15 impeller as someone recommended above, I like a 10-16 with a bored reduction nozzle.

A ported 701, let alone a stock motor without a pipe will not push a 10/16 hooker enough to have good bottom end. A 9/15 with a bored nozzle is what I have always run with excellent results in multiple 701 setups,including a ported 701 with a tnt v3 pipe and 144 mag at 200psi that was dialed in..10/16 would have been overkill and is what most would run in around the 800cc range.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

 

[Tyler Zane]

A ported 701, let alone a stock motor without a pipe will not push a 10/16 hooker enough to have good bottom end. A 9/15 with a bored nozzle is what I have always run with excellent results in multiple 701 setups,including a ported 701 with a tnt v3 pipe and 144 mag at 200psi that was dialed in..10/16 would have been overkill and is what most would run in around the 800cc range.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

I ran a 12-17 on a jetworks ported 701, bpipe, ada head and that ski was an animal out of the hole. I got several friends to switch from the "all mighty" 9/15 to a 10/16 hooker and they all gained in the whole rpm range. None of these skis are strokers or big bores.

We all have different needs, not everyone does circles around a setup wake. Im not willing to lose out on most of the rpm range for a grunt more bottom. 9/15, run out fast and even faster with a bored nozzle. Im just saying dont run a 9/15 and assume its the best option just because they are all the craze. Test a few impeller and nozzle combos and see what suits you.