OK, but its sunday morning here and the suns out, can i do it later but really happy to do it and you will be surprised what you can do, I did this exact engine in a fx1 and it was awesome. so playful and so reponsonsive. I love over powered skis but the fx1 with this engine is an amazing thing
A stock 62t is 118 transfers the same as 61x except they are not closed over with casting. The exhasut is where it differs and the 61x is 179 vs 182 on the 62t basicakkt the 62t is a cleaned up 61x with slightly higher exhaust. It will make more power every where. if you widen up the exhaust to...
The 61x will not have more bottom end snap than the 62t 701, the transfers are to blocked from the factory. you are more than capable i know but you can also download and print our porting templates off the site
A 701 62t is way better. By the time you port a 61x to make power you actually go past a 62t anyway. the reality id you can widen the exhaust port on a 701 62t and set the squish correctly, put some decent carbs, pipe on it and away you go.
Yes, of course — to a point. The mass of the piston and its speed determine the dynamic load, which in turn affects stretch throughout the system. A longer stroke increases piston speed, raising the dynamic load. That said, we don’t rev these engines particularly high, so it’s less of a concern...
Squish: The Simple Secret to Power, Cooling, and Reliability in Two-Stroke Engines
If you’re building or tuning a two-stroke engine, there’s one thing you absolutely need to get right: squish. It sounds weird, but it’s one of the most important parts of how your engine makes power, stays cool...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.