Get double PM storage and hide this ad for $0.83/month

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1
    X-H2
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    868
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Yamaha 62T/61X Displacement vs. Bore/Stroke Combinations

    I keep an Excel spread sheet that takes bore and stroke as variables and calculates displacement in ccs. Here it is. There is a lot to be learned from this. First of all, look at the trends. Each 1mm increment of bore gives a lot more increase in displacement than a 1mm increase in stroke.

    For those of you who want to play around with your own spread sheet, the equation is:

    displacement = 0.001*2*stroke*3.1415927*(bore/2)^2

    Enjoy.


    HTML Code:
    Displacement vs. Bore and Stroke Combinations for Yamaha 62T/61X-Based Motors																		
    
    All bore and stroke units in millimeters (mm)
    
    
    Bore		OEM	cc		+4mm	cc		+5mm	cc		+6mm	cc		+8mm	cc		+10mm	cc
    
    
    81.0		68	701		72	742		73	752		74	763		76	783		78	804
    81.5		68	709		72	751		73	762		74	772		76	793		78	814
    82.0		68	718		72	760		73	771		74	782		76	803		78	824
    82.5		68	727		72	770		73	780		74	791		76	813		78	834
    83.0		68	736		72	779		73	790		74	801		76	822		78	844
    83.5		68	745		72	789		73	799		74	810		76	832		78	854
    84.0		68	754		72	798		73	809		74	820		76	842		78	865
    84.5		68	763		72	808		73	819		74	830		76	852		78	875
    85.0		68	772		72	817		73	828		74	840		76	863		78	885
    85.5		68	781		72	827		73	838		74	850		76	873		78	896
    86.0		68	790		72	836		73	848		74	860		76	883		78	906
    86.5		68	799		72	846		73	858		74	870		76	893		78	917
    87.0		68	808		72	856		73	868		74	880		76	904		78	927
    87.5		68	818		72	866		73	878		74	890		76	914		78	938
    88.0		68	827		72	876		73	888		74	900		76	924		78	949
    88.5		68	837		72	886		73	898		74	910		76	935		78	960
    89.0		68	846		72	896		73	908		74	921		76	946		78	970
    89.5		68	856		72	906		73	919		74	931		76	956		78	981
    90.0		68	865		72	916		73	929		74	942		76	967		78	992
    90.5		68	875		72	926		73	939		74	952		76	978		78	1003
    91.0		68	885		72	937		73	950		74	963		76	989		78	1015
    91.5		68	894		72	947		73	960		74	973		76	999		78	1026
    92.0		68	904		72	957		73	971		74	984		76	1010		78	1037

  2. #2
    Brap!!! 2lick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Hatboro, PA - Indiana, PA
    Posts
    1,666
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    could you upload the .xls file!?!
    superjet

  3. #3
    X-H2
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    868
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I was originally going to do that, but the "Manage Attachments" function does not allow .xls file extensions. If someone can tell me how/where to post it I will.

  4. #4
    wannabe backflipper
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    gold coast
    Posts
    3,344
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    just post in on a file share page and then post the link
    8mm lamey superjet
    Doing my bit in increasing the carbon footprint

  5. #5
    for me to POOP on! michael950's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    2,274
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by cookerq62 View Post
    plug this =(((A2/2)^2)*PI()*B2*C2)/1000 into excel in cell D2

    cell A2=bore
    cell B2=stroke
    cell C2= the number of cylinders


    I don't know how do upload an excel file or I would just attach it
    From another thread.


    Last edited by michael950; 01-22-2007 at 08:20 PM.

  6. #6
    X-H2
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    868
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Someone send me a PM with your email and I'll send you the .xls file and you can upload it somewhere and post the link.

    I asked Superjett if vBulletin would support real-time html calculators in a thread but he said no. Plus, he correctly pointed out that there are a ton of displacement calculators on the web.

    The point of listing all of the combinations in tabular format was mainly to show things like how much more gain you get from a mm of bore increase versus a mm of stroke increase and such.

  7. #7
    I Dream 10' Surf!
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Bordentown, NJ
    Posts
    43
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Another way to calculate dispalcement

    To simplify the equation you can use this:
    ( bore x bore x stroke x 3.14 / 4000 ) x number of cylinders
    works well and accurate.

  8. #8
    Done Wrenchin Clean House
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Brandon/Valrico Fl
    Posts
    355
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by njfl View Post
    I was originally going to do that, but the "Manage Attachments" function does not allow .xls file extensions. If someone can tell me how/where to post it I will.
    Just change the file extension to .jpg and tell people to change it back when they download it.
    Putting the ski up for the winter, it's sailing season. i'll break the SJ and Blaster out for Daytona Freeride though.

  9. #9
    X-H2
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    868
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by EightySeven550 View Post
    Just change the file extension to .jpg and tell people to change it back when they download it.
    I tried that in the past and just tried again. vBulletin recognizes that it is not a valid image file. EightySeven550 PM me your email and I will send it to you to figure out how/where to put it.
    Last edited by njfl; 08-31-2009 at 01:30 PM.

  10. #10
    IS IT 2012 YET ? #ZERO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Indian Shores Beach, FL - U.S.A.
    Posts
    5,552
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked 36 Times in 20 Posts
    If you're too lazy to do the math, you can use this online engine displacement calculator. http://www.cbperformance.com/enginecalc.html

    Here are some more formulas. http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:...&ct=clnk&gl=us
    .
    Life without danger is a waste of oxygen, so go buy a SuperJet and start breathing water.

  11. #11
    formerly known as jfw432 Waternut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Macon, GA
    Posts
    3,918
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 24 Times in 10 Posts
    I don't want to hi-jack the thread but I figured this was going to be a power related displacement vs stroke discussion. I always thought that the bigger the stroke, the bigger the torque, but lower the max rpms. I'm sure there are other variables but what would be the performance difference between the stock stroke 85mm bore 772cc, +4 stroker 82.5mm bore 770cc, and the +5mm stroke 82mm bore 771cc? I can't see the displacement itself making any difference between the three but surely that actual performance would be different.

  12. #12
    Race Gas Rules SUPERTUNE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Clearwater Fl.
    Posts
    2,181
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 39 Times in 35 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by jfw432 View Post
    I don't want to hi-jack the thread but I figured this was going to be a power related displacement vs stroke discussion. I always thought that the bigger the stroke, the bigger the torque, but lower the max rpms. I'm sure there are other variables but what would be the performance difference between the stock stroke 85mm bore 772cc, +4 stroker 82.5mm bore 770cc, and the +5mm stroke 82mm bore 771cc? I can't see the displacement itself making any difference between the three but surely that actual performance would be different.
    Yes, longer strokes can make more torque for a Superjet/Waveblaster
    Long stroke, long rod small bore will make the best hp at the same cc due to the leverage of the stroke and the ease to fill a smaller bore more efficiently.
    But keep in mind of all the porting configurations when adding stroker cranks, this can kill you if you don't get it right to fit the combination.
    Chuck 'SUPERTUNE' Quenzler III
    2008 World Finals Champion Engine Builder
    http://www.xmetalworks.com/
    X Scream Inc. 1988 Carroll St. Clearwater, Fl. 33765 (727)442-7700
    xscream@tampabay.rr.com

  13. #13
    SoCal Wav Jumping shiznit ItsRixter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Sunny Diego
    Posts
    479
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    On the topic of bore and stroke can someone explain a little on compression?
    Why is that my sj 701 with 185 psi runs on 91 octane yet my 760 motor with 185 needs 100 octane? Look at the ADA racing site...noticewhen the 760 domes hit 185 psi they list 98 octane. Yet on the 701 head the domes for 185 list 91 octane.
    96 B1 Limited
    96 B1 Full Mod (donor ski for the 09)
    http://www.x-h2o.com/showthread.php?t=61887
    09 SJ project ski
    09 SJ Limited

  14. #14
    IS IT 2012 YET ? #ZERO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Indian Shores Beach, FL - U.S.A.
    Posts
    5,552
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked 36 Times in 20 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by ItsRixter View Post
    On the topic of bore and stroke can someone explain a little on compression?
    Why is that my sj 701 with 185 psi runs on 91 octane yet my 760 motor with 185 needs 100 octane? Look at the ADA racing site...noticewhen the 760 domes hit 185 psi they list 98 octane. Yet on the 701 head the domes for 185 list 91 octane.
    The exhaust port roof is 2mm taller on the 760 cylinder which causes the cranking compression to be lower and the dynamic compression to be higher.
    .
    Life without danger is a waste of oxygen, so go buy a SuperJet and start breathing water.

  15. #15
    1 night @ mc'smurf's junkyardj's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    barrie ont. canada
    Posts
    1,204
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    this is a great chart

  16. #16
    X-H2 masterblaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    2,377
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by SUPERTUNE View Post
    Yes, longer strokes can make more torque for a Superjet/Waveblaster
    Long stroke, long rod small bore will make the best hp at the same cc due to the leverage of the stroke and the ease to fill a smaller bore more efficiently.
    But keep in mind of all the porting configurations when adding stroker cranks, this can kill you if you don't get it right to fit the combination.

    interesting,how much does torque come up with the setup mentioned above,with the longer stroke,long rod setup if you add to it a big bore 85 mill flat top piston?

  17. #17
    X egbrig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    298
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Don't confuse torque with rev response.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts